Former news anchor pleads guilty after stabbing mother as she sat in bed

The October hearing follows a guilty plea, a competency restoration process and nearly a year of court proceedings in Wichita.

WICHITA, Kan. — Nearly a year after police rushed to a south Wichita home on Halloween morning, Angelynn Mock is approaching a sentencing hearing that is expected to bring a life prison term after the former television anchor admitted murdering her mother.

The Oct. 5 hearing is now the central remaining court event in a case that changed direction several times before Mock pleaded guilty Aug. 21. The 48-year-old admitted one count of first-degree murder in the death of Anita Avers, 80. Under the plea arrangement reported by the Sedgwick County District Attorney’s Office and local news organizations, the offense carries a presumptive sentence of life in prison with parole eligibility after 25 years. Judge Faith Johnson accepted the plea. The court must still formally pronounce sentence before that punishment becomes the judgment in the case.

The approaching sentencing date stands in sharp contrast to the uncertainty that surrounded the prosecution early this year. In January, another Sedgwick County judge found Mock incompetent to stand trial and ordered her to Larned State Hospital for evaluation and treatment. That ruling stopped the ordinary progress of the criminal case because a defendant must be able to understand the proceedings and assist counsel before a prosecution can move forward. The finding did not dismiss the murder charge. In late July, after reviewing a newer professional assessment, the court found Mock competent, clearing the way for hearings to resume.

Once the case restarted, it moved quickly. Rather than proceed through a preliminary hearing and toward a possible jury trial, Mock entered the guilty plea within weeks of being found competent. The plea resolved the criminal charge itself and eliminated the need for jurors to determine whether prosecutors had proved premeditated first-degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt. It also changed the status of many facts that had previously appeared only as allegations in charging documents. Mock has now admitted the murder offense, although some details of what occurred inside the home remain known chiefly through police records and statements summarized in the probable cause affidavit.

Those records trace the case to 7:52 a.m. on Oct. 31, 2025, when Wichita officers were dispatched to the 1500 block of East Crowley for a reported cutting. Mock was outside the residence when first responders arrived. Police found Avers unresponsive in her bed with multiple stab wounds. Emergency crews transported her to St. Francis Hospital, where she was pronounced dead at 8:26 a.m. Mock had injuries of her own and was taken for treatment before being booked into the Sedgwick County Jail. Four days later, prosecutors filed one count of first-degree murder after reviewing the homicide investigation.

The first minutes of the police response produced some of the most widely reported details of the case. A neighbor told local reporters that Mock had approached a vehicle asking for help contacting 911. Dispatch information reported by local media indicated that Mock claimed she had stabbed her mother to save herself. Investigators later wrote that Mock gave conflicting accounts of who attacked first. The affidavit said she told officers she had gone to Avers’ room to discuss a possible job opportunity and described seeing her mother handling knives. Detectives did not accept those accounts as a settled explanation of the killing, and prosecutors ultimately charged Mock with intentional, premeditated murder.

The affidavit also recorded statements that appeared to reflect delusional thinking. Police said Mock made comments indicating that she believed Avers was the devil and gave other descriptions that investigators regarded as unusual. Her stepfather told detectives about Mock’s history of mental health treatment and said a bipolar diagnosis had later been revised to schizoaffective disorder. Those assertions later became relevant background when the court ordered a formal competency evaluation. The competency process, however, concerned Mock’s ability to participate in the prosecution at that time; it did not itself decide her mental state on the morning Avers was killed.

Family information in the affidavit also complicated the picture of the hours before the death. Mock’s stepfather told investigators that the mother and daughter had spoken the previous night and that the interaction did not appear extraordinary to him. He also said he had known of earlier periods when Mock experienced significant problems but had not personally felt threatened by her. Such observations became part of the investigative record, yet they did not provide a complete explanation of why the confrontation occurred. No independent account from inside the bedroom established every step that led to the fatal violence.

Avers’ life extended well beyond the circumstances of her death. Her published obituary said she was born in Duluth, Minnesota, in 1944, attended high school in Iowa and spent more than three decades living in Minneapolis. She moved to Wichita in 1998 and later earned a master’s degree from Friends University. She became a licensed clinical marriage and family therapist and worked in counseling for years. Her obituary said she viewed that work as a special gift she could give other people. It also described an active family life and interests that included cooking, knitting, faith and enduring friendships.

Mock’s years in journalism brought additional attention to a prosecution that otherwise arose from a domestic homicide in Wichita. She had worked in television news in several states before becoming a morning anchor at KTVI Fox 2 in St. Louis. She remained there from 2011 until 2015 and later moved into private-sector employment. Local reporting on the affidavit said Mock had recently been considering another television-related opportunity and claimed that a discussion about employment was why she went to her mother’s bedroom that morning. That was Mock’s account to police, not an independently established motive for the killing.

The prosecution’s legal posture changed repeatedly over the next nine months. Mock was initially jailed on the murder charge, then underwent evaluation after her defense raised competency. Judge Jeffrey Goering ruled in January that she was not competent and ordered treatment. The case could not move toward trial during that period. In July, the court reached the opposite conclusion based on a more recent professional report and found she could participate in the proceedings. The Aug. 21 guilty plea before Johnson followed soon afterward, turning what had been a pending murder prosecution into a sentencing case.

The punishment described in the plea coverage is life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after 25 years. Parole eligibility is a future opportunity for review rather than a promise of release. The Oct. 5 hearing is expected to establish the formal sentence, address any remaining financial obligations or other matters covered by the plea, and enter the court’s final judgment. Until then, reports describing the life term refer to the presumptive sentence associated with the plea rather than a punishment already pronounced from the bench.

The case therefore ends its first year in a markedly different position from where it began. The early investigation centered on conflicting descriptions of a deadly confrontation inside a family home. The middle months centered on whether Mock was competent to face prosecution. The present stage centers on the consequences of her own guilty plea. When Mock returns to court Oct. 5, the judge is expected to move the case from admitted criminal responsibility to formal sentencing for Avers’ death.

Author note: Last updated September 30, 2026.