WHO’s New Treaty Threatens American Freedoms—Details Inside

House Republicans have taken action to prevent the Biden administration from collaborating with globalist external entities on matters that affect the lives of the American people. The House Committee on Appropriations has proposed a budget that, if approved, would terminate the involvement of the U.S. federal government with the World Economic Forum (WEF).

The proposal also aims to prohibit taxpayer funding of the World Health Organization (WHO), the Wuhan Institute of Virology, EcoHealth Alliance, and risky “gain-of-function” research.

This proposal is part of the Fiscal Year 2024 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Bill, which aims to reduce spending on activities and programs considered low-priority by the committee.
Furthermore, the bill takes a stance against government misinformation and disinformation programs.

As previously reported, Biden has actively advocated for the WHO’s proposed Pandemic Treaty, which would grant the organization increased censorship and surveillance powers. Not only has Biden stated his intention to sign the treaty without congressional approval, but he initiated the plan by urging the WHO to proceed with it last year.

The WHO’s proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) provide the globalist organization with extensive new powers that supersede the laws of sovereign nations.
The agreement would grant the Chinese Communist Party-linked WHO ultimate control over U.S. pandemic policies, including lockdowns, censorship, masking, vaccine mandates, and public surveillance.

Once a health or climate emergency is declared by the World Health Organization, every signatory, including the United States, must submit to the WHO’s authority. This entails complying with the WHO’s decisions on treatments, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and government surveillance.

Under the treaty, the WHO would have the authority to impose lockdowns on the public or censor the American people, thereby infringing upon their First Amendment rights and overriding the Constitution.

House Republicans are now seeking to prevent Biden’s engagement with unelected globalist organizations like the WEF and WHO.

However, this new bill must navigate a complex path through Congress and will encounter significant challenges in the Democrat-controlled Senate. It remains uncertain whether these proposed budget cuts will be implemented.

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) sees the proposal as a positive step but emphasizes the need for persistent follow-up for the bill to become a reality. He had previously written letters urging action to sever ties and funding to the WHO due to concerns about the alleged detrimental consequences of continued involvement.

On June 23, the proposal underwent subcommittee markup, a crucial stage in the legislative process. Opinions on the issue were divided, with Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (R-FL) and Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX) supporting the defunding, citing the ineffectiveness and failures of discredited United Nations bodies, including the WHO.

During this time, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) held a session on the WHO’s proposed pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations.

The HHS faced strong opposition from experts and activists.
Pamela Hamamoto, the lead U.S. negotiator for the pandemic treaty, emphasized the need for international cooperation in health crises but affirmed that the administration would not support any measures undermining U.S. sovereignty or security.

Moreover, Congress has witnessed an increase in opposition to the WHO.
Multiple bills demanding an end to funding or complete withdrawal from the WHO are currently under consideration.